Showing posts with label 1 Year ACS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1 Year ACS. Show all posts

Thursday, December 10, 2015

One Versus Five Year Estimates: Measuring Regional Poverty

With the release of the 2014 Five Year Estimates by the Census Bureau, we now have the ability to compare changes between two five year periods: 2005-2009, and 2010-2014. For the region (Herkimer and Oneida Counties combined) we have always been able to compare the one year estimates. These have been available since 2005. So why would someone want to compare five year estimates then?

Both the one year and the five year estimates have certain advantages. If you are interested in the MOST CURRENT DATA, then you should look at the one year estimates. These are the most up-to-date data available. However, if you'd like the most accurate data, then the five year estimates are the better answer. They have lower margins of error due to a larger sampling taken over five years and provide the most precise measure of the data.

Let's compare the two on a single graph. Below is a chart showing the one year estimates (in blue) from 2005 to 2014 for our region for the percentage of people in poverty. As you can see, there is a slight decline in poverty prior to the Great Recession (from 2005 to 2007), and then a huge spike following that event (note the rise from 2007 to 2011).

CLICK TO ENLARGE

In comparison, looking at the single year data may not give you the best idea of what has occurred. Because of the annual fluctuations, the overall trend gets a little lost - especially when you look at the last five years from 2010 to 2014. There are huge variations year to year, so how are you to get an accurate view of what is happening with poverty? This is where the five year estimates are helpful.

In looking at the 2009 Five Year Estimate and comparing it to the 2014 Five Year Estimate, you can see that there has been a substantial (indeed, a statistically significant) change between these two periods.In the last half of the last decade the poverty rate was at 14%; over the last five years the rate is now 16.4%.

PLEASE NOTE: THE FIVE YEAR ESTIMATES ARE NOT AVERAGES OF THE INDIVIDUAL FIVE YEARS. Rather, the data is collected over the five year and then measured as a whole.

In conclusion, both tools - the single year and the five year estimates - offer different advantages. Which one you prefer to use depends on what you are trying to measure !

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

World Statistics Day !

Official statistics help decision makers develop informed policies that impact millions of people. Improved data sources, sound statistical methods, new technologies and strengthened statistical systems enable better decisions that eventually result in better lives for all of us. On 20 October 2015, the global statistical community will showcase their achievements and their ongoing work to help this vision come true by celebrating World Statistics Day.

A small contribution - by subtracting out the Oneida County single year ACS data from our regional data for 2014, we can see what the Herkimer County data MIGHT look like. Full data estimates from the Census Bureau based on five year estimate samples will be released in December. In the meantime this is as close as we can guess what those numbers might look like!

PLEASE NOTE: THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL NUMBERS FOR HERKIMER COUNTY. THEY SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH CAUTION AND ARE INTENDED AS A PRELIMINARY LOOK AT WHAT THE HERKIMER COUNTY DATA COULD REFLECT IN DECEMBER.

Click on the table below to see the data.
CLICK TO ENLARGE

Monday, September 21, 2015

2015 Single Year ACS Data Released for Oneida County


Each year, the Census Bureau releases three versions of the American Communities Survey (ACS). These are the 1-Year and the 5-Year ACS Estimates. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 3 YEAR ACS HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED. These are released based on the population size of the municipality.

Five year estimates are released for EVERY level of census geography (down to the block group level) as well as every municipality (think town, city, and village). FIVE YEAR ESTIMATES WILL BE RELEASED IN DECEMBER OF 2016.

One year estimates are released for municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 65,000. This means they are mostly for counties and larger cities. For our region, ONLY ONEIDA COUNTY HAS SINGLE YEAR ESTIMATES AVAILABLE.

The most recent 1-Year Estimates are now a permanent part of this blog in the linked area just below the title above. A permanent link will take you to the most recent 1 year estimates post so you can always easily find this important data for both Oneida Counties !

Below are the individual links to the Demographic, Social, Economic and Housing Profiles for the 1 Year ACS Estimates for Oneida County.


2015 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Demographic Profile

2015 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Social Profile

2015 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Economic Profile

2015 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Housing Profile

2014 Single Year Estimates Released for Oneida County

The 2014 single year American Communities Survey data has been released, meaning that new information is available for Oneida County. Remember, single year estimates are for geographies with populations of 65,000 or more. For our region that only covers Oneida County. I will post the links to the data profiles for Oneida County shortly, but until I do, here is a sort of comparative summary of things that are noteworthy and statistically significant when comparing the 2014 data to the data collected in 2010.


Significant Changes in Oneida County Social Characteristics

  • ·         Family composition is changing.
    • ·         Fewer married couple families (from 49.5% in 2010 to 44.0% in 2014)
    • ·         Increase in single male (4.1% in 2010 to 5.7% in 2014) and single female (10.2% in 2010 to 13.3% in 2014)) headed families
  • ·         While the number of males age 15 and older has remained constant, there has been a significant decline in the number of females age 15 and older (roughly 97,700 in 2010 to 96,600 in 2014)
  • ·         The percent of the population age 25 or older with a high school education or higher has increased significantly, from about 86% in 2010 to 89% in 2014.
  • ·         More than half (57%) of the foreign born population has been naturalized according to 2014 data; this is significantly more than were naturalized as of 2010 (44%).
  • ·         More households report having a computer in 2014 (84%) than in 2013, the most recent comparative  year that this data was collected (79%)


Significant Changes in Oneida County Economic Characteristics

  • ·         Fewer workers age 16 and older are driving alone to work (84% in 2010 versus 81% in 2014); there has been a significant increase at the same time in the number of people working from home (2.3% in 2010 versus 4.4% in 2014)
  • ·         While the per capita income and median household income have not changed significantly, median family income has seen a significant decline – dropping from $66,111 in 2010 to $61,147 in 2014.
  • ·         Statistically the poverty rate for residents appears unchanged.


Significant Changes in Oneida County Housing Characteristics

  • ·         There are fewer owner occupied housing units in 2014 than in 2010 – 69% of housing was owner occupied in 2010 versus 65% in 2014. At the same time there has been an increase in renter occupied units.
  • ·         Median owner occupied housing unit value has increased significantly, from about $106,000 estimated value in 2010 to $116,000 in 2014.
  • ·         Median rent has remained the same statistically from 2010 to 2014.


Significant Changes in Oneida County Demographic Characteristics

  • ·         The number of people age 65 and over continues to increase significantly; in 2010 roughly 38,200 people were age 65 or older. In 2014, almost 40,700 residents were this old.
  • ·         In 2014, more people identified themselves as being of a single race (96.9% said they were one race in 2010; 98.1% now identify as being of a single race). In particular, those identifying as African American and those identifying as Asian both saw increases in the percent of the population that said they were of one of these races only.
  • ·         The overall minority population (this includes anyone who is not “white and non-Hispanic”) in Oneida County has grown significantly, going from 15.4% in 2010 to 17% in 2014.

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

An Example of Using ACS Estimates Over Time: Poverty and Family Types 2005 to 2013

As the single year (and the three year) American Community Survey (ACS) data continues to be released, it is important to remember that data now exists going back to 2005 for our area. One of the hopes of the Census Bureau was that such data availability would allow policymakers, as well as the public, the opportunity to look at their region longitudinally, albeit with a certain amount of caution.

As an example, below are the historical estimates of poverty by family type, in this case single mom families versus two parent families in Oneida County. Not surprisingly, poverty rates for single parents are quite a bit higher than they are for dual parent families - the average over the nine years is about 30% for single moms and around 5.5% for dual parent families.

Click to Enlarge


What's important to note is the trends depicted by the shaded areas in the chart, which represent the margins of error for each year. As can been seen, they are rather large for single moms and fairly small for dual parents. This is mainly because of the small number of single mom's sampled (due to their fairly small number within the community). Just be sure to take a look at those margins of error as you explore the ACS data as there are times that they are exceedingly large, and should then be viewed with a some caution.

Friday, September 26, 2014

Another Single Year "What Herkimer County Might Look Like" Table on Housing

Yesterday I posted a piece about what Herkimer County's single year demographic data might look like IF SUCH A PIECE WERE DONE BY THE CENSUS BUREAU.

Single year estimates are restricted to areas of 65,000 population or more for statistic reasons. Herkimer County, having a population of less than 65,000 therefore doesn't get single year estimates. They have to wait until the three year estimates are released (October 23rd) to get new information.

Given that the MSA is the combination of Herkimer AND Oneida Counties, and given that we have Oneida Counties numbers on their own, it is PLAUSIBLE to simply subtract Oneida County from the MSA and then you'd be left with what is essentially a Herkimer County Single Year Estimate.

Without getting into a discussion of all the statistical reasons THIS IS PROBLEMATIC, let me again offer the following:

THE DATA BELOW IS NOT A PRODUCT OF THE US CENSUS BUREAU AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A STATISTICALLY SOUND PROCESS FOR DETERMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POPULATION OF HERKIMER COUNTY. 

HOWEVER, IT IS A MATHEMATICALLY ACCURATE  REFLECTION OF THE UTICA ROME MSA MINUS THE ONEIDA COUNTY DATA FOR THE 2013 SINGLE YEAR ESTIMATES. 

THE RESULTS ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE REMAINING AREA, NAMELY HERKIMER COUNTY.

So with that in mind here is are housing related data that MAY reflect what the three year official estimates will look like in about a month from now. Please view them with this in mind!


Thursday, September 25, 2014

What Herkimer County's 2013 Single Year Estimates MIGHT Look Like...

...if such a beast were produced.

The single year releases of American Communities Survey (ACS) estimates are done ONLY for communities or municipal entities with a population of 65,000 or more. For our region, that means Oneida County gets to see single year estimates, since their population is in excess of 230,000. Similarly the Utica-Rome MSA (which is comprised of Herkimer County and Oneida County combined) also gets to see single year estimates. Herkimer County, unfortunately, falls just a few hundred people short of qualifying for single year data. Instead they have to wait an additional month for the Three Year Estimates to come out before they get a chance to see how they may have changed in the past couple years.

WITH GREAT TREPIDATION, I have taken it upon myself to at least take a look at what the Herkimer County SINGLE year data MIGHT look like IF SUCH A THING EXISTED. It doesn't. But that doesn't mean it can't be inferred.

Given that the MSA is the combination of Herkimer AND Oneida Counties, and given that we have Oneida Counties numbers on their own, it is PLAUSIBLE to simply subtract Oneida County from the MSA and then you'd be left with what is essentially a Herkimer County Single Year Estimate.

Without getting into a discussion of all the statistical reasons THIS IS PROBLEMATIC, let me just offer the following:

THE DATA BELOW IS NOT A PRODUCT OF THE US CENSUS BUREAU AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A STATISTICALLY SOUND PROCESS FOR DETERMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POPULATION OF HERKIMER COUNTY. 

HOWEVER, IT IS A MATHEMATICALLY ACCURATE  REFLECTION OF THE UTICA ROME MSA MINUS THE ONEIDA COUNTY DATA FOR THE 2013 SINGLE YEAR ESTIMATES. 

THE RESULTS ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE REMAINING AREA, NAMELY HERKIMER COUNTY.

I would urge caution with these numbers and use them simply as a means for anticipating what the three year estimates, to be released October 23rd, might show us. Below are some of the basic demographic data for what COULD be the Single Year Estimates of Herkimer County.


Tuesday, September 23, 2014

A Comparison in Oneida County: 2013 versus 2010 American Community Survey Data

Recently the Census Bureau released data for the 2013 American Communities Survey (ACS) One Year Estimates. Oneida County, as an entity with a population of more than 65,000 people, is part of this release. While I posted the 2013 standard profiles of the county, the true value of the ACS lies in the ability to see if we have changed over the last several years, instead of waiting ten years for the next decennial census to be done.

Below are several comparisons of data from 2010 and 2013. Unless noted, all data show statistically significant increases or decreases between the 2010 and 2013 one year estimates. These are generally the pieces of data that have shown some change from 2010 to 2013. There are plenty of other data pieces that can be looked at - but in most cases what you see in the 2013 data in those cases is not statistically different than what was found in 2010. So below you can find most of the data pieces that appear to have changed over the last several years at least.



Racial Changes: We continue to see growth in the minority population in Oneida County.






Click to Enlarge

Elderly Population: The elderly population has grown by some 2,000 people over the last three years; there is no statistical changes in terms of the percent of elderly in poverty.


   

Click to Enlarge
Housing Tenure: There is significantly more rental housing units in 2013 than there were in 2010, and a significant decrease in housing units occupied by home owners. In addition, there is a significant increase in one bedroom housing units as well.


 
Click to Enlarge


Income and Poverty: Median Household Income, as well as Per Capita Income, has declined from 2010 to 2013. Poverty rates for families remains steady but for individuals has increased.



Click to Enlarge
Marital Status and Families: Fewer males and females are married as of 2013 than there were in 2010. The percent of families made up of married couples has dropped while the percent of single parent families has increased significantly.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

2013 Single Year ACS Data Released for Oneida County

Each year, the Census Bureau releases three versions of the American Communities Survey (ACS). These are the 1-Year, the 3-Year, and the 5-Year ACS Estimates. These are released based on the population size of the municipality. Five year estimates are released for EVERY level of census geography (down to the block group level) as well as every municipality (think town, city, and village). Three year estimates are only released for geographies or municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 20,000 persons. So many smaller villages and towns are excluded. One year estimates are released for municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 65,000. This means they are mostly for counties and larger cities. For our region, ONLY ONEIDA COUNTY HAS SINGLE YEAR ESTIMATES AVAILABLE.

The most recent 1-Year Estimates are now a permanent part of this blog in the linked area just below the title above. A permanent link will take you to the most recent 1 year estimates post so you can always easily find this important data for both Oneida Counties !

Below are the individual links to the Demographic, Social, Economic and Housing Profiles for the 1 Year ACS Estimates for Oneida County.


2013 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Demographic Profile

2013 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Social Profile

2013 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Economic Profile

2013 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Housing Profile

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Single Year 2013 ACS Data to be Release on Thursday, September 18th

Data collected in 2013 from the nation’s most comprehensive survey will be released in less than 2 days, on Thursday, September 18th,  The one year estimates of the 2013 American Communities Survey (ACS) provides statistics on more than 40 demographic, social, economic and housing topics. Some of the topics covered include income, poverty, health insurance, educational attainment, the commute to work, the foreign-born population, language spoken at home, ancestry, occupation, number of vehicles available and housing costs.

These statistics will be available for the nation, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, every congressional district and all counties, places and metropolitan areas with populations of 65,000 or more. For our region that includes the county of Oneida, as well as the Utica- Rome MSA (which is the combination of Herkimer and Oneida Counties).

I will try to get the basic profiles up as soon as I can on Thursday, followed by some analysis of areas of change sometime shortly after that !

Friday, November 22, 2013

Comparing ACS Data: Economic Changes Over the Last Five Years in Oneida County

An earlier examination of the social changes in Oneida County suggested by the single year estimates of the American Communities Survey (ACS) data between 2008 and 2012, came with a considered warning about placing the data and trends found there within context. It is important to exercise due caution when looking at significant changes in the ACS over time such that the trends that seem to be present make some sense in the larger picture. This is just as true about the economic profiles found in the ACS as it was with the social profiles.

Income Measures: That being said, let's begin with what the data does NOT show us - or more accurately, what it shows us has not changed in the last five years. Specifically, that the income levels of the region have remained relatively stable over that time frame. Income can be measured several ways. Typically we measure income based on the family median income, the household median income or the per capita income of the county. Here's a look back at these measures in the 2011 Five Year ACS for every municipality in the region.

The graph below shows the single year ACS income data from 2008 to 2012. Based on the margins of error for each income measure, the reality is that income levels haven't changed significantly since 2008 for families, households or on a per capita basis.For families it remains around $60,000; for households it is about $47,000; and on a per capita basis it is around $25,000. The fluctuations seen across the last five years are not statistically significant.

Click to Enlarge



Poverty: At the same time as income has remained relative stable, however, we have seen a significant increase in the percentage of the population that has fallen into poverty.Looking at the population as a whole, the percent of the County's residents who live in poverty has climbed from around 14% in 2008 to about 16.4% in 2012. Similarly, there has been an increase in the percentage of families in poverty over this period - from 10% in 2008 to 12.5% of families in 2012.

Click to Enlarge


Health Insurance Coverage: The last piece of economic data noted here that has changed significantly since 2008 is the number of people covered by health insurance.  Health insurance is measured in two broad sectors - specifically as being provided by the private sector or as being provided by the public sector.

These two types of coverage are not mutually exclusive, but may be. In other words, you could have someone who receives private insurance, and also has some public/government insurance coverage as well. Keep that in mind as you look at the graphic below, in that the data is not intended to add up to 100% - the coverage by either a private vender or public resource is totally independent of one another.

Click to Enlarge
Statistically speaking we have seen a decrease in the percentage of the population with private insurance coverage in the last five years. It has fallen from around 72% of the population in 2008 to about 67% of the current population. In terms of public insurance coverage, we have seen an increase in the percentage of the county's population using public insurance options from about 35% in 2008 to roughly 39% as of 2012.

While other comparative data may show statistically significant changes between 2008 and 2012, these few items are the ones that seem to suggest decipherable trends worth noting.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Comparing ACS Data: Where We Have Come in the Last Five Years in Oneida County

I'd like to provide some insights into the utility of the American Communities Survey (ACS) data that has been collected for nearly a decade now. The resulting information we have gained about our region CAN now be looked at across time in ways that weren't possible in the past. After all, such data used to be collected through the decennial census, so we only saw it once every 10 years. With the ACS, areas with populations in excess of 65,000 people have data available on an annual basis. So, theoretically, we should be able to track how things have changed over time without having to wait 10 years for the next census to arrive.

The "benefits" of doing this are questionable however. Not so much because there is limited ability to make policy changes on the fly as new data comes along. Rather, the limitations of comparing the data across small incremental time periods is that the data is based on small samples that often have large margins of error. To learn more about the MOEs (or margins of error) you may want to revisit this post. So as I share information about changes we've seen in the last five years, please make note of the fact that ACS is best viewed with caution and in the context of other meaningful data sets.

So where have we come then? Well let's begin with a look at how we have changed in terms of our social profile.

While many data points could be examined, I will only talk about those that have changed in a statistically significant way over the last 4 or 5 years, and that also seem to show a pattern of change that makes intuitive sense as well. All of the following data concerns Oneida County from the year 2008 to 2012. 

Families, Nonfamilies, and the Elderly: Statistically, we have seen a decline in the number of family households in the county between the years 2008 and 2012 (64.5% versus 61,2%, respectively). This comes at the same time as we see a significant rise in non-family households, from 35.5% to 38.8% between 2008 and 2012. "Nonfamilies" are householders living alone, or with other non-related individuals. Within these nonfamilies, we have found an increase in the percentages of people who actually live by themselves, as well as among those who are age 65 or older. One third of all people living in households in the county are "loners" - they live alone with no one else present. And nearly one in seven households in the county (14%) are occupied by a lone senior citizen. In both these cases, the percentage of households that are occupied by either a person living alone, or in which an elderly person is living alone, has increased significantly since 2008.

Click to Enlarge


Marital Status For Males and Females: It appears as though fewer males and females are reporting that they are married and living together now than five years ago. While about 49% of males said that they were married and living with their spouse in 2009, that number has dropped significantly to 46% of males in the most recent ACS data. Among women, the percentage has gone from around 46% in 2009 to about 43% in 2012. The percentage of females indicating that they were divorced has increased as well over the same period.

Click to Enlarge


Highest Level of Education: The population appears to be more well educated now that it was five years ago. Fewer people reported their highest level of education as being a high school diploma (it has dropped from about 35% in 2008 to around 32% in 2012), while more people said that they had attained a bachelors degree or higher (from a low of 19% in 2009 to as many as 24% in 2012).
Click to Enlarge


Foreign Born Populations and Language Spoken At Home: More foreign-born people now live in the county than did five years ago. In 2008 about 6.4% of the population reported being foreign born. Now, around 8% of the county's population claims birth in a foreign country. Along the same lines, more people are speaking a language other than English at home as well. In 2008, about 10% of the population reported that English wasn't the primary language that they spoke while at home. In 2012, 13% of county residents speak something other than English while at home.

Click to Enlarge


Future Comparative Posts: Statistically speaking, these are the main social changes we have seen in the last five years within Oneida County, based on the ACS data. Still to come if future posts will be and examination of the changes we have seen economically and in terms of housing data. Again, be careful to recognize that the limitation of the ACS data lies in the margins of error that come with relative small sampling done with the survey instrument. Such data as provided here should be used as a springboard for looking at other data sets that may address the social, economic or housing issues brought forth by the ACS comparison files.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

2012 One Year ACS Estimates Released

Each year, the Census Bureau releases three versions of the American Communities Survey (ACS). These are the One Year, the Three Year, and the Five Year ACS Estimates. These are released based on the population size of the municipality.   
  • Five year estimates are released for EVERY level of census geography (down to the block group level) as well as every municipal  civil division (think town, city, and village).  
  • Three year estimates are only released for geographies or municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 20,000 persons. So many smaller villages and towns are excluded.  
  • One year estimates are released for municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 65,000. This means they are mostly available for counties and larger cities.

What this means for municipalities is that in some cases (Oneida County for example), each year there are 3 levels of ACS released - the One Year, the Three Year, and the Five Year ACS Estimates ALL include Oneida County data. Other communities, like Herkimer County, only have two versions of the ACS that cover them - the Three Year, and the Five Year ACS Estimates. And even still smaller areas, say the tiny villages such as Newport, can only find annual updates of data in the Five Year estimates.

The most recent One Year Estimates for 2012 were released today, so new information is now available for Oneida County (and larger geographies like New York State). A permanent link, located just above the banner of this blog will take you to the most recent ACS data for each county, including this new release of One Year ACS data for Oneida County.

Below are the individual links to the most recent (2012) ACS One Year Estimate's Demographic, Social, Economic, and Housing Profiles for Oneida County as well as the Utica-Rome Municipal Statistical Area (Oneida County and Herkimer County combined).

Oneida County ACS One Year Demographic Profile
Oneida County ACS One Year Social Profile
Oneida County ACS One Year Economic Profile
Oneida County ACS One Year Housing Profile

Utica-Rome MSA ACS One Year Demographic Profile
Utica-Rome MSA ACS One Year Social Profile
Utica-Rome MSA ACS One Year Economic Profile
Utica-Rome MSA ACS One Year Housing Profile

 The Three Year ACS data, which will include Herkimer County data, are scheduled to be released October 24, 2013.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

COMING SOON ! New ACS Data !!!

According to the US Census Bureau, just after the middle of the month the Census Bureau will be releasing the 2012 One Year Estimates for geographies of 65k or more. This means we can get data for Oneida County and for the Metropolitan Statistical Area (Herkimer and Oneida Counties combined). Ostensibly you could subtract out the Oneida County data from the MSA data to see what Herkimer County seems to look like. It's not an ideal thing to do, but if you were looking for some sort of indication of what was going on in Herkimer County that would be one way. On the other hand you could just wait til the next multi-year ACS release in October as well.

In the meantime, here's the release outline for September 19th !


Thursday, September 20, 2012

Single Year ACS Data for Oneida County (2012)

Each year, the Census Bureau releases three versions of the American Communities Survey (ACS). These are the 1-Year, the 3-Year, and the 5-Year ACS Estimates. These are released based on the population size of the municipality. Five year estimates are released for EVERY level of census geography (down to the block group level) as well as every municipality (think town, city, and village). Three year estimates are only released for geographies or municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 20,000 persons. So many smaller villages and towns are excluded. One year estimates are released for municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 65,000. This means they are mostly for counties and larger cities. For our region, ONLY ONEIDA COUNTY HAS SINGLE YEAR ESTIMATES AVAILABLE.

The most recent 1-Year Estimates are now a permanent part of this blog in the linked area just below the title above. A permanent link will take you to the most recent 1 year estimates post so you can always easily find this important data for both Oneida Counties !

Below are the individual links to the Demographic, Social, Economic and Housing Profiles for the 1 Year ACS Estimates for Oneida County.


2012 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Demographic Profile

2012 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Social Profile

2012 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Economic Profile

2012 Oneida County ACS 1 Year Housing Profile

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Single Year ACS Data for Oneida County

Each year, the Census Bureau releases three versions of the American Communities Survey (ACS). These are the 1-Year, the 3-Year, and the 5-Year ACS Estimates. These are released based on the population size of the municipality. Five year estimates are released for EVERY level of census geography (down to the block group level) as well as every municipality (think town, city, and village). Three year estimates are only released for geographies or municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 20,000 persons. So many smaller villages and towns are excluded. One year estimates are released for municipalities with a MINIMUM population of 65,000. This means they are mostly for counties and larger cities. For our region, ONLY ONEIDA COUNTY HAS SINGLE YEAR ESTIMATES AVAILABLE.

The most recent 1-Year Estimates are now a permanent part of this blog in the linked area just below the title above. A permanent link will take you to the most recent 1 year estimates post so you can always easily find this important data for both Oneida Counties !

Below are the individual links to the Demographic, Social, Economic and Housing Profiles for the 1 Year ACS Estimates for Oneida County.

Oneida County 1 Year ACS Demographic Data 2010

Oneida County 1 Year ACS Social Data 2010

Oneida County 1 Year ACS Economic Data 2010

Oneida County 1 Year ACS Housing Data 2010